The Runtime Complexity (innermost) of the given CpxTRS could be proven to be BOUNDS(n^1, INF).

(0) Obligation:

Runtime Complexity TRS:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

minus(n__0, Y) → 0
minus(n__s(X), n__s(Y)) → minus(activate(X), activate(Y))
geq(X, n__0) → true
geq(n__0, n__s(Y)) → false
geq(n__s(X), n__s(Y)) → geq(activate(X), activate(Y))
div(0, n__s(Y)) → 0
div(s(X), n__s(Y)) → if(geq(X, activate(Y)), n__s(n__div(n__minus(X, activate(Y)), n__s(activate(Y)))), n__0)
if(true, X, Y) → activate(X)
if(false, X, Y) → activate(Y)
0 → n__0
s(X) → n__s(X)
div(X1, X2) → n__div(X1, X2)
minus(X1, X2) → n__minus(X1, X2)
activate(n__0) → 0
activate(n__s(X)) → s(activate(X))
activate(n__div(X1, X2)) → div(activate(X1), X2)
activate(n__minus(X1, X2)) → minus(X1, X2)
activate(X) → X

Rewrite Strategy: INNERMOST

(1) DecreasingLoopProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)

The following loop(s) give(s) rise to the lower bound Ω(n¹):
The rewrite sequence
minus(n__s(X), n__s(Y)) →⁺ minus(X, Y)
gives rise to a decreasing loop by considering the right hand sides subterm at position [].
The pumping substitution is [X / n__s(X), Y / n__s(Y)].
The result substitution is [ ].

(2) BOUNDS(n^1, INF)